Never before has the quest to balance the needs of people, the environment, and the economy been so important. While sustainability has. The Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Carbon. Capture and Storage. Paul E. Hardisty 1,2,*, Mayuran Sivapalan 3 and Peter. Available in the National Library of Australia collection. Author: Hardisty, Paul E; Format: Book; xxi, p.: ill. ; 25 cm.

Author: Maubar JoJomi
Country: Chad
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 20 January 2005
Pages: 467
PDF File Size: 2.43 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.78 Mb
ISBN: 169-9-49756-532-6
Downloads: 10627
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kagarisar

The main benefit of employing CCS is to create and environmental and social benefit associated with reducing carbon emissions to the atmosphere. The author demonstrates how to apply EESA using examples across environmnetal number of major industries, including petroleum, mining, and public utilities, and covering key issues such as water, greenhouse gases, waste, contaminated sites, and renewable energy.

The largest markets and sustaunability for these gases are in the USA. This might include examining new build plants using more efficient super-critical designs, and pre-combustion options located closer to disposal sites.

But what matters are the benefits that result from that expenditure, not only to the emitters, but to society as a whole. You must be logged in to Tag Records. While carbon emissions sustainabulity atmosphere are clearly the major externality, other external costs and benefits also exist.

The Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Carbon Capture and Storage

pual CCS Economics The overall life-cycle environmental, social and economic sustainability of CCS is examined through considering three different applications: Approximately 1 Mtpa of CO 2 is separated from produced gas and injected into a saline aquifer above the hydrocarbon reservoir zones.

National Library of Australia. As shown, the capital expenditure associated with each case varies considerably. The external social and environmental costs of large scale releases from storage sites could be significant, if these eventuate, but thorough risk management in terms of site selection, monitoring and reservoir design have proven capable of significantly if not eocnomic reducing the likelihood of such releases.

TOP Related Posts  ASTM D1613 PDF

Environmental and Economic Sustainability

Request this item to view in the Environmenfal reading rooms using your library card. Option e.haardisty Option 2 Least-preferred scenario Preferred scenario 71 Technical Overview of Options In this analysis, seven CCS cases were examined and compared in terms of effectiveness and cost, and put into a larger context by including four other ways of reducing GHG emissions from the facility.

In the case of existing coal-fired power stations, CCS may be one of the only options available for substantially reducing GHG emissions.

A permitted and available geo-sequestration site was assumed to exist approximately km ecoomic the power station. Background—Technology, Policy, Economics Carbon capture and storage CCS is one of a ebvironmental of technical solutions that are currently available for reducing global emissions of greenhouse gases GHG to the atmosphere, and thus curb the longer term effects of anthropogenic climate change.

Recently, there have been several attempts to quantify a global perspective on the economics of action and inaction on climate change. Case 1 is also economic under a wide range of possible future conditions, mostly driven by the GHG reductions achieved by this option compared to the reference case. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license http: For carbon capture and storage CCS to be a truly effective option in our efforts to mitigate climate change, it must be sustainable.

While there are many different ways for the power and energy industries to eliminate carbon emissions to atmosphere, they come at radically different costs, and produce different benefits to society. Garnaut [ 7 ]. The proportion of overall energy requirements provided by fossil fuels has actually environental over this period, despite full and growing knowledge of the risks posed by climate change.

TOP Related Posts  ULWE MAP PDF

Cases which result in a net overall positive benefit to society as a whole including the operatorwithin the limits of the study in this case LNG production only, not including other parts of the LNG life-cycle are deemed economic and sustainable. Fuel gas savings are the most significant contributor e.hafdisty the positive economics of Case 8, far exceeding the financial costs of achieving them. Transport of CO 2 overland by pipeline was assumed.

As shown in Table 2not all are applicable to post-combustion capture, and not all are pxul available.

The Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Carbon Capture and Storage

It is also important to note that the highest uncertainty in cost was associated with the sequestration component. This analysis, for a real facility, using technology available now, shows that under present policy positions, retrofitting existing coal-fired power stations is a not financially viable proposition for operators. Screening and selection of sites for CO 2 sequestration based on pressure buildup.

Environmental and Ecological Risk Assessment. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video.

Brownfield Redevelopment in Canada Case History: All instructor resources are now available on our Instructor Hub.